The Gospel of Mark as Theological Allegory

References

• Adamczewski, Bartosz 2014. The Gospel of Mark: A Hypertextual Commentary, Frankfurt: Peter Lang GmbH.
• Borg, Marcus J. 2001. Reading the Bible Again for the First Time: Taking the Bible Seriously but Not Literally, San Francisco, CA: HarperCollins.
• Carrier, Richard 2014. On the Historicity of Jesus: Why We Might Have Reason for Doubt, Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press.
• Dykstra, Tom 2012. Mark, Canonizer of Paul: A New Look at Intertextuality in Mark's Gospel, St Paul, Minnesota: Ocabs Press.
• Goulder, Michael 1995. St. Paul versus St. Peter: A Tale of Two Missions, Westminster: John Knox Press.
• Marcus, Joel 2000. Mark – Interpreter of Paul, New Testament Studies 46/4: 473–87.
• MacDonald, Dennis R. 2006. My Turn: A Critique of Critics of 'Mimesis Criticism', URL = <http://iac.cgu.edu/drm/My_Turn.pdf>.
• Price, R. G. 2007. The Gospel of Mark as Reaction and Allegory, URL = <http://www.rationalrevolution.net/articles/gospel_mark.htm>.
• Price, R. G. 2014. How a Fictional Jesus Gave Rise to Christianity, URL = <http://www.rationalrevolution.net/articles/fictional_jesus.htm>.
• Price, Robert M. 2011. The Christ–Myth Theory and Its Problems, Cranford, New Jersey: American Atheist Press.
• Sanders, E. P. 2001. Paul: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Svartvik, Jesper 2000. Mark and Mission: Mk 7: 1–23 in its Narrative and Historical Contexts, Stockholm: Almqvist &amp; Wiksell.
• Tarazi, Paul N. 1999. The New Testament Introduction: Paul and Mark, Crestwood, New York: St Vladimir's Seminary Press.
• Tolbert, Mary Ann 1996. Sowing the Gospel: Mark's Work in Literary-Historical Perspective, Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress.
• Turton, Michael 2004. Historical Commentary on the Gospel of Mark, URL = <http://www.michaelturton.com/Mark/GMark_index.html>.