A Historical Introduction to the
Philosophy of Science

I picked up John Losee's book, A Historical Introduction to the Philosophy of Science (fourth edition), with a view to using it in a series of sessions on the philosophy of science. I was looking for a book that cast a wide net over thinking about the nature and limits of science going back to the schools in Ancient Greece. I wanted a book that was reasonably thorough, yet understandable by readers who were not well-versed in academic philosophy. This book tries to steer that middle ground.

As Losee mentions in his Preface, his book is written for students of the history of science and the philosophy of science. Understandably, then, the book is a bit of a challenge for those not initiated into formal studies in philosophy. Losee assumes the reader is familiar with the history of the physical and biological sciences and a working knowledge of formal logic. My hope is that with some guidance through the book with a more experienced tutor, some of the more difficult sections will be comprehensible.

Losee's book is an excellent overview of the key strands in the philosophy of science over the last two and a half millennia. For this book, Losee focuses on the key characters, moving fluidly from Aristotle, progressing through the scholastic period in Europe, the positivist period in the middle of last century and ending with contemporary thinkers, such as Feyerabend, Kuhn, Laudan and Lakatos.

As Losee discusses the core arguments from each of the thinkers he addresses, he helpfully illustrates some of the main problems with the view he is explaining. Losee takes pains to not present a caricature of the philosopher he is critiquing. He paints a picture of each philosopher he discusses as a deep thinker with complex and nuanced views.

In each chapter, Losee centres his discussion about particular philosophers on a specific theme. Nonetheless, these core themes recur throughout Losee's books. These themes include the nature of scientific laws (necessary versus nominal), the problem of justification (logical versus historical) and the intent of scientific models (realism versus instrumentalism).

On the down side, this fourth edition contains some distracting typographical errors. In addition, the reader would have benefited from Losee introducing some of the technical terms before using them in his text. This book is ambitious in its scope, covering as it does over two millennia of thought on this subject. I would have liked some more context around each of the discussions to make it easier for the philosophically and scientifically uninitiated to understand the technical topic being discussed. However, I appreciate that this would have at least doubled the size of what is already a voluminous text.

In the following sections of this review, I summarize each chapter in Losee's book and add some clarifying comments. These notes are used in a series of seminars on Losee's book. To find out more about this seminar series and join in the discussion, visit Philosophy Matters Events.

Copyright © 2022–3 Leslie Allan