linkedinbloggertumblr
facebooktwittergoogleplus

Towards an Objective Theory of Rationality

References – Epistemology

References – Epistemology

Book cover: Philosophy of Science: An Historical Anthology by Timothy McGrew, Marc Alspector-Kelly and Fritz Allhoff
  • Allan, Leslie 2016a. The Existence of Mind-Independent Physical Objects, URL = <http://www.rationalrealm.com/philosophy/metaphysics/mind-independent-physical-objects.html>.
  • Allan, Leslie 2016b. Imre Lakatos: A Critical Appraisal, URL = <http://www.rationalrealm.com/philosophy/epistemology/imre-lakatos-critical-apraisal.html>.
  • Ariew, Roger 2014. Pierre Duhem, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2014 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta, URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/duhem/>.
  • Aune, Bruce 1970. Rationalism, Empiricism and Pragmatism: An Introduction, New York: Random House.
  • Ayer, A. J. 1969. The Problem of Knowledge, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
  • Ayer, A. J. 1971. Language, Truth and Logic, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
  • Ayer, A. J. 1972. Probability and Evidence, London: Macmillan.
  • Ayer, A. J. 1974. The Origins of Pragmatism, London: Macmillan.
  • Ayer, A. J. 1979. The Foundations of Empirical Knowledge, London: Macmillan.
  • Barnes, Barry and David Bloor 1982. Relativism, Rationalism and the Sociology of Knowledge, in Rationality and Relativism, eds M. Hollis and S. Lukes, Oxford: Blackwell: 21–47.
  • Berkeley, George 1710 (1974). Principles of Human Knowledge, in Berkeley's Philosophical Writings, ed. D. M. Armstrong, New York: Macmillan: 41–128.
  • Berkeley, George 1713 (1974). Three Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous, in Berkeley's Philosophical Writings, ed. D. M. Armstrong, New York: Macmillan: 129–225.
  • Bird, Alexander 2012. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions and its Significance: An Essay Review of the 50th Anniversary Edition, URL = <http://bjps.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2012/10/30/bjps.axs031.full> The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (Advance Access: October 30, 2012): 1–26.
  • Bird, Alexander 2013. Thomas Kuhn, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2013 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta, URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/thomas-kuhn/>.
  • BonJour, Laurence 2013. Epistemological Problems of Perception, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2013 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta, URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2013/entries/perception-episprob/>.
  • Chakravartty, Anjan 2014. Scientific Realism, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta, URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/scientific-realism/>.
  • Chalmers, A. F. 1979. Towards an Objectivist Account of Theory Change, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30: 227–33.
  • Chalmers, A. F. 1980. An Improvement and a Critique of Lakatos's Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, Methodology and Science 13: 2–27.
  • Chalmers, A. F. 1982. What Is This Thing Called Science?, 2nd edn, Queensland: University of Queensland Press.
  • Cohen, I. B. 1976. William Whewell and the Concept of Scientific Revolution, in Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 39, eds R. S. Cohen, P. K. Feyerabend and M. W. Wartofsky, Dordrecht: Reidel: 55–63.
  • Craig, William 1953. On Axiomatizability within a System, Journal of Symbolic Logic 18/1, March: 30–32.
  • Craig, William 1956. Replacement of Auxiliary Expressions, Philosophical Review 65: 38–55.
  • Duhem, Pierre 1962. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, trans. Phillip P. Weiner, New York: Atheneum.
  • Ellis, Brian 1965a. The Origin and Nature of Newton's Laws of Motion, in Beyond the Edge of Certainty, ed. E. G. Colodny, Prentice Hall: 29–68.
  • Ellis, Brian 1965b. A Vindication of Scientific Inductive Practices, American Philosophical Quarterly 2/4, October.
  • Ellis, Brian 1979. Rational Belief Systems, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Ellis, Brian 1984. The Ontology, La Trobe University, unpublished.
  • Ellis, Brian 1984. Scientific Realism, La Trobe University, unpublished.
  • Ellis, Brian 1984. The Programme of Analysis, La Trobe University, unpublished.
  • Ellis, Brian 1984. Realism and Truth, La Trobe University, unpublished.
  • Ellis, Brian 1984. Solving the Problem of Induction, La Trobe University, unpublished.
  • Feigl, Herbert 1970. Research Programmes and Induction, in PSA 1970, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 8, eds R. C. Buck and R. S. Cohen, Dordrecht: Reidel: 147–50.
  • Feyerabend, Paul K. 1967. Review of the Structure of Science, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 18: 237–49.
  • Feyerabend, Paul K. 1970. Consolations for the Specialist, in Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, eds I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave, London: Cambridge University Press: 197–230.
  • Feyerabend, Paul K. 1974. Zahar on Einstein, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25: 25–28.
  • Feyerabend, Paul K. 1975. Against Method, London: Verso.
  • Feyerabend, Paul K. 1978. Science in a Free Society, London: Verso.
  • Feyerabend, Paul K. 1979. On the Critique of Scientific Reason, in Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 39, eds R. S. Cohen, P. K. Feyerabend and M. W. Wartofsky, Dordrecht: Reidel: 109–43.
  • Fox, John F. 1981. Critical Notice: Appraising Lakatos, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 59/1: 92–103.
  • Franklin, Allan 1984. Are Paradigms Incommensurable?, URL = <http://www.oxfordjournals.org/page/4874/3> The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35/1: 57–60.
  • Gardner, Martin 1957. Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science, New York: Dover.
  • Grandy, Richard E., ed., 1973. Theories and Observation in Science, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
  • Hall, Richard J. 1970. Can We Use the History of Science to Decide Between Competing Methodologies, in PSA 1970, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 8, eds R. C. Buck and R. S. Cohen, Dordrecht: Reidel: 151–9.
  • Hanson, Norwood Russell 1970. Is There a Logic of Scientific Discovery? in Readings in the Philosophy of Science, ed. B. A. Brody, Prentice-Hall: 620–33.
  • Hempel, Carl G. 1966. Philosophy of Natural Science, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
  • Hilgard, Ernest R. and Richard C. Atkinson 1953. Introduction to Psychology, 4th edn, New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
  • Howson, Colin, ed., 1976. Method and Appraisal in the Physical Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hoyningen-Huene, Paul 1992. The Interrelations between the Philosophy, History and Sociology of Science in Thomas Kuhn's Theory of Scientific Development, URL = <http://www.oxfordjournals.org/page/4874/1> The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43/4: 487–501.
  • Hurd, D. L. and J. J. Kipling, eds, 1964. The Origins and Growth of Physical Science, Volume 1, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
  • Hurd, D. L. and J. J. Kipling, eds, 1964. The Origins and Growth of Physical Science, Volume 2, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
  • Irzik, Gürol and Teo Grünberg 1995. Carnap and Kuhn: Arch-Enemies or Close Allies?, URL = <http://www.oxfordjournals.org/page/4874/5> The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46/3: 285–307.
  • Koertge, Noretta, 1970. Inter-theoretic Criticism and the Growth of Science, in PSA 1970, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 8, eds R. C. Buck and R. S. Cohen, Dordrecht: Reidel: 160–73.
  • Koertge, Noretta 1976. Rational Reconstructions, in Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 39, eds R. S. Cohen, P. K. Feyerabend and M. W. Wartofsky, Dordrecht: Reidel: 359–69.
  • Kragh, Helge 2013. "The Most Philosophically Important of All the Sciences": Karl Popper and Physical Cosmology, Perspectives on Science 21/3: 325–357.
  • Kuhn, Thomas S. 1957. The Copernican Revolution, New York: Random House.
  • Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970a. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970b. Notes on Lakatos, in PSA 1970, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 8, eds R. C. Buck and R. S. Cohen, Dordrecht: Reidel: 137–46.
  • Kuhn, Thomas S. 1980. The Halt and the Blind: Philosophy and the History of Science, URL = <http://www.oxfordjournals.org/page/4874/8> The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 31/2: 181–92.
  • Lakatos, Imre and Alan Musgrave, eds, 1970. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge,London: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lakatos, Imre 1970. Replies to Critics, in PSA 1970, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 8, eds R. C. Buck and R. S. Cohen, Dordrecht: Reidel: 174–82.
  • Lakatos, Imre 1978a. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers Volume 1, eds J. Worrall and G. Currie, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lakatos, Imre 1978b. Mathematics, Science and Epistemology: Philosophical Papers Volume 2, eds J. Worrall and G. Currie, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Locke, John (1690) 1976. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. A. D. Woozley, London: Collins.
  • Mason, Stephen F. 1962. A History of the Sciences, New York: Collier.
  • Mayo, Deborah G. 1996. Ducks, Rabbits, and Normal Science: Recasting the Kuhn's-Eye View of Popper's Demarcation of Science, URL = <http://www.oxfordjournals.org/page/4874/9> The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47/2: 271–90.
  • McGinn, Colin 1979. An A Priori Argument for Realism, Journal of Philosophy 76/3: 113–33.
  • McMullin, Ernan 1976. The Fertility of Theory and the Unit for Appraisal in Science, in Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 39, eds R. S. Cohen, P. K. Feyerabend and M. W. Wartofsky, Dordrecht: Reidel: 395–432.
  • Miller, Arthur I. 1974. On Lorentz's Methodology, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25: 29–45.
  • Musgrave, Alan 1971. Kuhn's Second Thoughts, URL = <http://www.oxfordjournals.org/page/4874/6> The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 22/3: 287–97.
  • Musgrave, Alan 1974. Logical versus Historical Theories of Confirmation, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25: 1–23.
  • Musgrave, Alan 1976. Method or Madness?, in Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 39, eds R. S. Cohen, P. K. Feyerabend and M. W. Wartofsky, Dordrecht: Reidel: 457–91.
  • Nagel, Ernest 1961. The Structure of Science, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Pap, Arthur 1963. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, London: Eyre and Spottiswoode.
  • Popper, Karl R. 1968. The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London: Hutchinson.
  • Post, H. R. 1976. Novel Predictions as a Criterion of Merit, in Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 39, eds R. S. Cohen, P. K. Feyerabend and M. W. Wartofsky, Dordrecht: Reidel: 493–95.
  • Prokhovnik, S. J. 1974. Did Einstein's Programme Supersede Lorentz's, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25: 336-9.
  • Quine, Willard Van Orman 1963. From a Logical Point of View, 2nd edn, London: Harper and Row.
  • Quine, W. V. and J. S. Ullian 1970. The Web of Belief, New York: Random House.
  • Radnitzky, Gerard 1976. Popperian Philosophy of Science as an Antidote Against Relativism, in Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 39, eds R. S. Cohen, P. K. Feyerabend and M. W. Wartofsky, Dordrecht: Reidel: 505–46.
  • Reichenbach, Hans 1980. From Copernicus to Einstein, trans. Ralph B. Winn, New York: Dover.
  • Rudner, Richard 1953. The Scientist Qua Scientist Makes Value Judgements, Philosophy of Science 20/1: 1–6.
  • Salmon, Wesley C. 1966. The Foundations of Scientific Inference, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Sankey, Howard 1993. Kuhn's Changing Concept of Incommensurability, URL = <http://www.oxfordjournals.org/page/4874/2> The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44/4: 759–74.
  • Schaffner, Kenneth F. 1974. Einstein versus Lorentz: Research Programmes and the Logic of Comparative Theory Evaluation, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25: 45–78.
  • Scheibe, Erhard 1976. Conditions of Progress and the Comparability of Theories, in Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 39, eds R. S. Cohen, P. K. Feyerabend and M. W. Wartofsky, Dordrecht: Reidel: 547–68.
  • Shimony, Abner 1976. Comments on Two Epistemological Theses of Thomas Kuhn, in Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 39, eds R. S. Cohen, P. K. Feyerabend and M. W. Wartofsky, Dordrecht: Reidel: 569–87.
  • Stanford, Kyle 2013. Underdetermination of Scientific Theory, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2013 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta, URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/scientific-underdetermination/>.
  • Toulmin, Stephen 1976. History, Praxis and the 'Third World'. Ambiguities in Lakatos' Theory of Methodology, in Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 39, eds R. S. Cohen, P. K. Feyerabend and M. W. Wartofsky, Dordrecht: Reidel: 655–75.
  • Swinburne, Richard, ed., 1974. The Justification of Induction, London: Oxford University Press.
  • Swoyer, Chris 2014. Relativism, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2014 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta, URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/relativism/>.
  • Thornton, Stephen 2014. Karl Popper, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2014 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta, URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/popper/>.
  • Wartofsky, Marx W. 1976. The Relation Between Philosophy of Science and History of Science, in Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 39, eds R. S. Cohen, P. K. Feyerabend and M. W. Wartofsky, Dordrecht: Reidel: 717–37.
  • Worrall, John 1976 .Thomas Young and the 'Refutation' of Newtonian Optics: A Case-study in the Interaction of Philosophy of Science and History of Science, in Method and Appraisal in the Physical Sciences, ed. Colin Howson, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 107–79.
  • Zahar, Elie 1973. Why Did Einstein's Research Programme Supersede Lorentz's, in Method and Appraisal in the Physical Sciences, ed. Colin Howson, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 211–75.

Copyright © 2016

You will be interested in

Share This

  • twitter
  • facebook
  • linkedin
  • googleplus
  • gmail
  • delicious
  • reddit
  • digg
  • newsvine
  • posterous
  • friendfeed
  • googlebookmarks
  • yahoobookmarks
  • yahoobuzz
  • orkut
  • stumbleupon
  • diigo
  • mixx
  • technorati
  • netvibes
  • myspace
  • slashdot
  • blogger
  • tumblr
  • email
Short URL:http://bit.ly/1PZuZWq

SUBSCRIBE NOW




Privacy
PDF Download Towards an Objective Theory of Rationality

Download this essay

PDF Download Imre Lakatos and a Theory of Rationality

Download complete essay on Imre Lakatos and a Theory of Rationality